Guidelines On the Practice of Astrology

It has now been roughly two years since I last posted on this site. During that period I quit practicing astrology altogether; I quit taking readings and I phased out all of my classes. This was for a mix of reasons, some personal, some political and some religious. I needed to back off for awhile.

I am now convinced it is time for me to pick up doing astrology again, hopefully with a fresh perspective on what I’m doing. In order to do that I needed to think long and hard about what an appropriate set of guidelines would be to practice astrology effectively.

This essay is a set of notes that lays out my thoughts along these lines. Part of what I am doing here is pointing out mistakes that I think need to be avoided. This is an area I can speak as an authority since I have made all of these mistakes at one time or other in my astrology life.

There is some overlap between some of these notes, and I circle back to some topics a couple of times to add further detail. This also complements a post I wrote around three years ago, titled, Tips on Astrology Interpretation.

You can think of these as guidelines for practicing astrology effectively; or, you can take them as advice to aspiring astrologers; or you can view these as my talking to myself about the mistakes I have seen and have made myself, and what I have learned from them.

Continue reading “Guidelines On the Practice of Astrology”

Saturn and Ouranos

In my previous post, on Uranus and Neptune, I talked about how the meanings of the planets changed when we added the new outer planets. I want to address the enormous impact in modern astrology of having the outer planet Uranus be in an orbit beyond that of Saturn.

In the first part of this essay I will spell the name of the Greek god as Ouranos rather than Uranus. I want to avoid immediate association with the modern planet of that name. The word in the original Greek means the Heavens or the Sky. Ouranos and Gaia, or Heaven and Earth, together gave birth to a large number of gods, including Kronus, better known by his Roman name of Saturn. Continue reading “Saturn and Ouranos”

What About Uranus and Neptune?

This post is in response to a question to an earlier essay that I wrote, On the Meanings of Saturn and Pluto. In that essay I argued that the modern meanings of Pluto were originally associated with the planet Saturn, and that the meanings of Saturn ended up being simplified and impoverished.

Here is the specific comment that I want to respond to.

Hello.
I’ve been reading a lot of your journal posts recently. I’m wondering if you can write something about Uranus and Neptune in a way you did with Saturn and Pluto. Are Uranus and Neptune borrowing traits from some other planets (maybe Mercury and Jupiter)?

I haven’t done posts on Uranus and Neptune because I don’t think there is a simple, one to one correspondence between either of them and a single traditional planet. You also have to take into account that adding the three modern outer planets also changes the entire system.

Here are my thoughts on Uranus and Neptune, and traditional astrology.

Uranus

Of the two planets I think Uranus is the easier to sort out. In traditional terms I would say that Uranus has some meanings that were originally attributed to Mars, and some to Mercury.

From Mars we get the meanings of disruption, sudden cataclysmic change, shock, and so on.

From Mercury we get the association with technology, communication, ways of thinking, ideas and so on. Mix the two together and you also get pioneers, rebels, outcasts.

That’s part of it.

Beyond that, consider the question of how adding Uranus the Oddball outside of the traditional seven planets affects the meanings of the whole system in general, and of Saturn in particular. This is a complex topic, and I go into it in a fair amount of detail in my recent book, Saturn Through the Ages: Between Time and Eternity.

In the traditional system Saturn is the outermost of the seven traditional moving planets, at the border between the moving spheres of the planets and the unmoving sphere of the fixed stars and the unchanging heavens. Saturn is at the interface between time and eternity, and mediates the eternal order down into the world of motion and change. This has a rich and complex mix of meanings that I discuss in the Saturn book.

Add Uranus outside Saturn and the whole dynamic changes. Saturn is reduced to being associated with the past, with the establishment, the old order, and the limitations of the old order, while Uranus becomes the new, the rebel, the pioneer, the disrupter, the individual and individual thinker moving forward into the uncharted future. Future and New are good, while the Past and the Old are evil and restricting. There is a whole broad change in value judgments that goes with that change, and I analyze that in my Saturn book.

It gets complicated very quickly.

Neptune

When we turn to the planet Neptune, things get a lot messier and murkier, which is a very Neptunian sort of a situation. I connect Neptune to some meanings from at least three of the traditional planets.

There is the moon, especially the dark waning moon. The Moon is related to liquids and the ocean. The dark malefic moon is related to witchcraft, enchantment, illusion, deceptions, and also to poisons. (Just to make it more messy, poisons are also associated with Saturn.) Think of the cliche image of witches meeting at night under the moon to go on their journeys and work their malefic spells.

There is Venus, especially Venus debilitated and dangerous. Venus is associated with glamour, with dreams, with the magnetic attraction of beautiful and intoxicating things. Venus when debilitated is associated with enchantment. Venus associates with glamour, which is a very Neptunian sort of word, and also very Venusian – again, think lovely, glamourous, bewitching, intoxication. It is a very magnetic and seductive sort of energy. Venus is also associated with intoxicating drinks and drugs, and the deception from that. Think of lovely, enchanting, seductive and dangerous, coming under someone’s spell.

There is also a connection of Neptune with some of the meanings of Jupiter, and here things get especially complex. Neptune at its highest is now associated with spirituality, and that is traditionally under the domain of Jupiter.

The problem here is that the meaning and connotations of the words spirituality and religion have changed greatly in the past few hundred years, enough so that what we now think of as Neptunian spirituality would have made no sense to a devoutly religious and “spiritual” person of prior ages.

Just the fact that we split off the meanings of spiritual and religious from each other, and that we can talk about “spiritual but not religious”, is a very modern sort of phenomenon. The meanings of the word spiritual have become much more vague, nebulous, unformed, subjective, dreamy – much more Neptunian.

Along with that, the meanings of Jupiter, and the full meanings of the concept of religion, have become shallower, more negative, cheapened and even degraded. Like the Saturn and Uranus association of Past and Future, Religion becomes associated with a restrictive past and Spirituality with an open-ended and unformed Future. There are all sorts of complex changes in value judgments that go with that change in meaning.

Like I said, it gets complicated very quickly.

The Larger Question

Beyond any question of which traditional planet the modern planets took their meanings from, there is a larger issue of overall change in system and in meaning. The more I think about it, the more I am of the opinion that the original question, of which planet meant what, is the wrong question.

In modern astrology the meanings attributed to the traditional seven planets have become much simpler, thinned down, less complex and multi-dimensional. Rather than approaching the question in terms of the modern meanings, I think there is the larger question of recovering the fuller, richer and more complex meanings of the traditional seven. My most recent book, on The Classical Seven Planets, is trying to do just that.

If you  just start with the modern meanings of the planets and assume that they are adequate, you are missing a lot of the depth and subtlety of traditional astrology. If you want to learn traditional astrology I think it makes more sense to just set the modern planets aside and spend time immersing yourself in the entire traditional system. It is worth taking the time to get to know the traditional meanings of the planets on their own terms.

A Change in Meaning – Complexity in Astrology

by Charlie Obert

In modern astrology as compared to traditional there is a change in the number of planets – you go from the seven in traditional to nine (or ten if you still count Pluto) modern planets. In addition, many modern astrologers also include various asteroids, dwarf planets and other significant points.

This is not just a simple adding of a couple of points to a set. Changing the number of points changes how we perceive the whole set, how we work with it.

There is a general principle regarding that – the more items you add to a set, the less attention, meaning and complexity you can give to any member of the set. An increase in complexity in one way is balanced by a simplification in another way.

I want to use the rest of this essay unpacking this principle and examining its implications in our lives, especially in our astrology. Continue reading “A Change in Meaning – Complexity in Astrology”

On the Late, Great Planet Pluto

by Charlie Obert

I don’t think well on my feet. I do my best thinking sitting relaxed, with a cup of hot tea and some classical music on in the background – at the moment it is Beethoven string quartets. This gives me time to really think through subjects before I say or write anything.

I have some things to think out in this post.

Yesterday I made a post to my Facebook page about how I thought it was time to stop treating Pluto as a full fledged planet, and that position could no longer be easily justified in either traditional or modern terms.

I reproduce my post here.

At the risk of being the party pooper in the astrology community – I really don’t think continuing to make a big deal out of Pluto works today with either traditional or modern astrology.

In traditional terms it is not one of the classical planets, and traditional astrology works very well without it. I have quit including it in the charts I do. (For that matter, most of the time I now leave out Uranus and Neptune.) Most of the meanings assigned to Pluto were originally part of the more complex traditional signification of Saturn – I talk about that in my recent book on Saturn.

In modern terms it is no longer considered a planet – it is in 2006 that Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet. Any astrologer that speaks at all about being “scientific” is on shaky ground in science terms by hanging on to Pluto’s significance as a full planet. Still treating Pluto as a planet is being way behind the times scientifically.

The concepts normally attached to Pluto are pretty ominous, and very vague, and you can attach them to pretty much anything because of that vagueness. At any given point in time you can find SOMETHING going on you could assign to Pluto.

I find that leaving Pluto out eliminates a kind of ominous background noise, like clearing away a cloud of smoke.

I am just starting to see occasional posts referring to the eight (rather than nine) planets, so maybe we’re starting to get caught up.

– Charlie Obert
Facebook, February 6, 2020

—-
The post drew quite a flurry of responses, most of them negative, mostly trying to “prove” to me that Pluto is a planet.

My reaction to pretty much all of the pro-Pluto posts was something like this: Continue reading “On the Late, Great Planet Pluto”

Consulting the Divine – The Practice of Astrology

This post is a meditation on the purpose of astrology, what conditions need to be in place to have a good and valid reading. It is also a description of how I go about doing a reading.

I do not think astrology is primarily about prediction or fortune-telling. I also do not think that astrology is something that the astrologer does as a solo performance, putting on a kind of miracle show while the client just sits back and watches.

I am convinced that astrology is not well suited for for vague “tell me what’s going to happen to me” readings. Astrology is a sacred art, a consultation with the Gods, and we can use this predictive tool because the ordered and symbolic movement of the heavens mirrors the divine order. When we study astrology we are contemplating divine order – we are peering into the mind of the Holy.

Astrology works best in response to a heartfelt need for guidance from the Gods. The medieval astrologer Guido Bonatti lays this out very clearly in the first sections of his 146 Considerations chapter from his landmark compilation, The Book of Astronomy, and William Lilly echoes that in his little book that is an earlier translation of Bonatti, The Art of Astrology.

Here is what Bonatti has to say – this is quoting from the Ben Dykes translation of Bonatti’s 146 Considerations.

“…he must observe this manner of asking, plainly that he ought to pray to the Lord God, from Whom every good beginning leads, and to entreat Him (with all devotion and with a contrite spirit) that it should fall to him to reach an understanding of the truth of those things about which he intends to ask. Then with this truth he ought to go to the astrologer with intention concerning that about which he is going to ask, …and the intention for which he retains in his heart for a day and a night (or more), not touched by just any motion of the mind.

…the beginning statement of which, however, is always the name of the Highest; for certain people sometimes do otherwise, and for that reason they come to be deceived in themselves, and they sometimes pressure the astrologer – or rather, they often lie; for a stupid querent makes the responding wise man deviate sometimes; and men, not knowing the folly of him who asks poorly, sometimes defame and revile the astrologer when the astrologer is not guilty…”(p 265)

Consider the implications of this lovely statement of Bonatti’s.

Continue reading “Consulting the Divine – The Practice of Astrology”

Hypnotic Realities

Many years ago I used to to be a character at the Renaissance Festival. Along with entertainers of all sorts there were also tarot readers, and for people who worked in that area it was a good venue to do a lot of readings in a very short period of time. Some readers I know made a good part of their living by doing festivals like this. From my experience, these were people who were committed to their craft and tried to practice it in a useful and ethically responsible manner.

I clearly remember one day there was a man who was out at festival, who was going around among the festies and asking where the tarot reader was who had done a reading for his wife the previous weekend… it seems the reader had told the woman that her husband was cheating on her. The man said this was not true, and he was seriously angry for this reader wrecking his wife’s trust of him. He was out at the festival that day looking for revenge.

Adultery… a very dangerous subject to touch in a reading. Especially if you get it wrong. I am assuming that the reader made this statement in good faith based on what she was seeing in the cards. Assuming that man was telling the truth when he said it was false, that reading might have wrecked a marriage. That woman was looking at her husband and seeing a man who was cheating on her, and anything he said to deny it would just look to her like he was lying. Once that idea was accepted by her it became self-validating. If I were that man I’d be ready to kill that tarot reader.

Continue reading “Hypnotic Realities”

Ladder of the Planets

My practice of astrology today is based on what I learned during a period of several years in which I confined myself to rules and techniques from traditional astrology. As part of that, I eliminated the 3 modern outer planets from my practice. Obviously this also means that I used only the traditional rulerships, where Mars rules Scorpio, Saturn rules Aquarius, and Jupiter rules Pisces. There is a beauty, symmetry and power to the traditional rulership system, with the planets arranged in pairs around the two lights, Sun and Moon, in the order of their distance from the Sun.

During the past year I have been exploring, and re-discovering, some of the techniques and viewpoints of modern western astrology.  Along with that study, I now place a very high priority on having the different approaches to astrology all respect and learn from each other. While at one point I was convinced that traditional astrology was superior, I now think that was arrogance on my part, and that the different astrology systems are each different points of view, and have their own respective strengths and weaknesses.

So, as a (mostly) traditional astrologer, I want to be able to dialog with modern astrologers, speak their language, and use the best of their techniques and insights.

That means coming to terms with the modern planetary rulerships, where Scorpio is now ruled by Pluto, Aquarius is ruled by Uranus, and Pisces is ruled by Neptune. That is the system used by most of the astrologers I know. The problem is, introducing those new rulers disturbs the symmetry and integrity of the traditional system, and that is far more important than you might think if you don’t have experience in traditional astrology.

However, if I am going to dialog with modern astrologers, I need to be able to speak the language of modern rulerships, so I always have my eye out for a framework in which I can make sense of modern rulerships while still keeping the symmetry of the original system intact.

I think I have found an interesting and possibly fruitful approach, and I want to examine it here.

Continue reading “Ladder of the Planets”